4.7 Article

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 positively regulates inflammation and down-regulates NF-κB p50 signaling in cultured microglia cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12974-015-0449-7

关键词

LRRK2; Microglia; Neuroinflammation; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Michael J Fox Foundation
  2. Telethon-Italy [GGP12237]
  3. Umberto Veronesi Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Over-activated microglia and chronic neuroinflammation contribute to dopaminergic neuron degeneration and progression of Parkinson's disease (PD). Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), a kinase mutated in autosomal dominantly inherited and sporadic PD cases, is highly expressed in immune cells, in which it regulates inflammation through a yet unclear mechanism. Methods: Here, using pharmacological inhibition and cultured Lrrk2(-/-) primary microglia cells, we validated LRRK2 as a positive modulator of inflammation and we investigated its specific function in microglia cells. Results: Inhibition or genetic deletion of LRRK2 causes reduction of interleukin-1 beta and cyclooxygenase-2 expression upon lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation. LRRK2 also takes part of the signaling trigged by alpha-synuclein fibrils, which culminates in induction of inflammatory mediators. At the molecular level, loss of LRRK2 or inhibition of its kinase activity results in increased phosphorylation of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kappa B) inhibitory subunit p50 at S337, a protein kinase A (PKA)-specific phosphorylation site, with consequent accumulation of p50 in the nucleus. Conclusions: Taken together, these findings point to a role of LRRK2 in microglia activation and sustainment of neuroinflammation and in controlling of NF-kappa B p50 inhibitory signaling. Understanding the molecular pathways coordinated by LRRK2 in activated microglia cells after pathological stimuli such us fibrillar alpha-synuclein holds the potential to provide novel targets for PD therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据