4.8 Article

Arabidopsis thaliana Leaf Form Evolved via Loss of KNOX Expression in Leaves in Association with a Selective Sweep

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 24, 页码 2223-2228

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.037

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E00489X/1]
  2. Royal Society
  3. Federation of European Biochemical Societies
  4. Gatsby Foundation
  5. Max Planck Society
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F012934/1, BB/D010977/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E00489X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. BBSRC [BB/D010977/1, BB/F012934/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. NERC [NE/E00489X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences
  11. Division Of Environmental Biology [0817033] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Morphological diversity is often caused by altered gene expression of key developmental regulators. However, the precise developmental trajectories through which morphologies evolved remain poorly understood. It is also unclear to what degree genetic changes contributing to morphological divergence were fixed by natural selection. Here we investigate these problems in the context of evolutionary developmental transitions that produced the simple unlobed leaf of the model species Arabidopsis thaliana. We demonstrate that A. thaliana leaf shape likely derived from a more complex lobed ancestral state that persists in extant Arabidopsis species. We also show that evolution of the unlobed leaf form in A. thaliana involved loss of expression of the knotted1-like homeobox gene SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) in leaves and that cis-regulatory divergence contributed to this process. Further, we provide evidence for a selective sweep at the A. thaliana STM locus, indicating that loss of STM expression in A. thaliana leaves may have been fixed by positive selection. In summary, our data provide key information as to when and how the characteristic leaf form of A. thaliana evolved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据