4.8 Article

Extracellular Sugar Modifications Provide Instructive and Cell-Specific Information for Axon-Guidance Choices

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 24, 页码 1978-1985

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. Muscle Dystrophy Association
  2. McKnight Foundation
  3. NIH [2R01NS039996-05, 5R01NS050266-03, 5R01HD055380, 5T32NS07098]
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Fellow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heparan sulfates (HSs) are extraordinarily complex extracellular sugar molecules that are critical components of multiple signaling systems controlling neuronal development [1-3]. The molecular complexity of HSs arises through a series of specific modifications, including sulfations of sugar residues and epimerizations of their glucuronic acid moieties. The modifications are introduced nonuniformly along protein-attached HS polysaccharide chains by specific enzymes [4]. Genetic analysis has demonstrated the importance of specific HS-modification patterns for correct neuronal development [2,3]. However, it remains unclear whether HS modifications provide a merely permissive substrate or whether they provide instructive patterning information during development. We show here with single-cell resolution that highly stereotyped motor axon projections in C. elegans depend on specific HS-modification patterns. By manipulating extracellular HS-modification patterns, we can cell specifically reroute axons, indicating that HS modifications are instructive. This axonal rerouting is dependent on the HS core protein Ion-2/glypican and both the axon guidance cue slt-1/Slit and its receptor eva-1. These observations suggest that a changed sugar environment instructs slt-1/Slit-dependent signaling via eva-1 to redirect axons. Our experiments provide genetic in vivo evidence for the HS code hypothesis which posits that specific combinations of HS modifications provide specific and instructive information to mediate the specificity of ligand/receptor interactions [3, 5, 6].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据