4.8 Article

Impaired synaptic plasticity and motor learning in mice with a point mutation implicated in human speech deficits

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 354-362

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.060

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U142684173, MC_U142684175, G0200482, MC_U142684172, MC_UP_1502/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wellcome Trust [073334, 080971] Funding Source: Medline
  4. MRC [MC_U142684173, MC_U142684172, G0200482, MC_UP_1502/1, MC_U142684175] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0200482, MC_UP_1502/1, MC_U142684173, MC_U142684175, MC_U142684172] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most well-described example of an inherited speech and language disorder is that observed in the multigenerational KE family, caused by a heterozygous missense mutation in the FOXP2 gene [1]. Affected individuals are characterized by deficits in the learning and production of complex orofacial motor sequences underlying fluent speech and display impaired linguistic processing for both spoken and written language [2]. The FOXP2 transcription factor is highly similar in many vertebrate species, with conserved expression in neural circuits related to sensorimotor integration and motor learning [3, 4]. In this study, we generated mice carrying an identical point mutation to that of the KE family, yielding the equivalent arginine-to-histidine substitution in the Foxp2 DNA-binding domain. Homozygous R552H mice show severe reductions in cerebellar growth and postnatal weight gain but are able to produce complex innate ultrasonic vocalizations. Heterozygous R552H mice are overtly normal in brain structure and development. Crucially, although their baseline motor abilities appear to be identical to wild-type littermates, R552H heterozygotes display significant deficits in species-typical motor-skill learning, accompanied by abnormal synaptic plasticity in striatal and cerebellar neural circuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据