4.8 Article

Dynamics effects of of a memory trace: Sleep on consolidation

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 393-400

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.062

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [G0401403] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [S18043] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0601841B, G0401403] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [S18043] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Medical Research Council [G0401403] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is evidence that sleep is important for memory consolidation, but the underlying neuronal changes are not well understood. We studied the effect of sleep modulation on memory and on neuronal activity in a memory system of the domestic chick brain after the learning process of imprinting. Neurons in this system become, through imprinting, selectively responsive to a training (imprinting) stimulus and so possess the properties of a memory trace. Results: The proportion of neurons responsive to the training stimulus reaches a maximum the day after training. We demonstrate that sleep is necessary for this maximum to be achieved, that sleep stabilizes the initially unstable, selective responses of neurons to the imprinting stimulus, and that for sleep to be effective, it must occur during a particular period of time after training. During this period, there is a time-dependent increase in EEG activity in the 5-6 Hz band, that is, in the lower range of the theta bandwidth. The effects of sleep disturbance on consolidation cannot be attributed to fatigue or to stress. Conclusions: We establish that long-term trace consolidation requires sleep within a restricted period shortly after learning. Undisturbed sleep is necessary for the stabilization of long-term memory, measured at the behavioral and neuronal levels, and of long-term but not short-term neuronal responsiveness to the training stimulus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据