4.4 Article

Calibration of Self-Reported Dietary Measures Using Biomarkers: An Approach to Enhancing Nutritional Epidemiology Reliability

期刊

CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-013-0353-5

关键词

Biomarker; Calibration; Cardiovascular disease; Epidemiology; Nutrition; Measurement error

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA119171, P01 CA053996] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM106177] Funding Source: Medline
  3. WHI NIH HHS [N01WH22110] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA053996, R01CA119171] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM106177] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. WOMEN&apos
  7. S HEALTH INITIATIVE - OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR NIH [N01WH022110] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reports from nutritional epidemiology studies lack reliability if based solely on self-reported dietary consumption estimates. Consumption biomarkers are available for some components of diet. These can be collected in subsets of study cohorts, along with corresponding self-report assessments. Linear regression of (log-transformed) biomarker values on corresponding self-report values and other pertinent study subject characteristics yields calibration equations for dietary consumption, from which calibrated consumption estimates can be calculated throughout study cohorts. Nutritional epidemiology disease association studies of enhanced reliability can be expected from analyses that relate disease risk to calibrated consumption estimates. Applications to the study of energy and protein consumption in relation to cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and cancer in the Women's Health Initiative will be briefly summarized. Also, challenges related to variables that may either mediate or confound associations of interest will be described, along with the need for longitudinal biomarker and self-report data, and the need for additional nutritional biomarker development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据