4.2 Article

Change in Body Mass Index Before and After Alzheimer's Disease Onset

期刊

CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 349-356

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1567205010666131120110930

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; body mass index; prospective study; weight

资金

  1. NIH [K99 AG042483, R01AG007370, R01AG037212, R01AG028506]
  2. NIA [U01 AG016976]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: A high body mass index (BMI) in middle-age or a decrease in BMI at late-age has been considered a predictor for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, little is known about the BMI change close to or after AD onset. Methods: BMI of participants from three cohorts, the Washington Heights and Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP; population-based) and the Predictors Study (clinic-based), and National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC; clinic-based) were analyzed longitudinally. We used generalized estimating equations to test whether there were significant changes of BMI over time, adjusting for age, sex, education, race, and research center. Stratification analyses were run to determine whether BMI changes depended on baseline BMI status. Results: BMI declined over time up to AD clinical onset, with an annual decrease of 0.21 (p= 0.02) in WHICAP and 0.18 (p= 0.04) kg/m(2) in NACC. After clinical onset of AD, there was no significant decrease of BMI. BMI even increased (b= 0.11, p= 0.004) among prevalent AD participants in NACC. During the prodromal period, BMI decreased over time in overweight (BMI >= 25 and < 30) WHICAP participants or obese (BMI >= 30) NACC participants. After AD onset, BMI tended to increase in underweight/normal weight (BMI < 25) patients and decrease in obese patients in all three cohorts, although the results were significant in NACC study only. Conclusions: Our study suggests that while BMI declines before the clinical AD onset, it levels off after clinical AD onset, and might even increase in prevalent AD. The pattern of BMI change may also depend on the initial BMI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据