4.2 Article

FTD and ALS: A Tale of Two Diseases

期刊

CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 273-294

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/156720511795563700

关键词

ALS; FTD; FUS; motor disease; proteinopathies; TAU; TDP-43; ubiquitin inclusions

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [ZIA AG000975, Z99 AG999999, ZIA AG000975-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R99 AG999999] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first reports of disorders that in terms of cognitive and behavioral symptoms resemble frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and in terms of motor symptoms resemble amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) bring us back to the second half of the 1800s. Over the last 150 years, and especially in the last two decades, there has been growing evidence that FTD signs can be seen in patients primarily diagnosed with ALS, implying clinical overlap among these two disorders. In the last decade pathological investigations and genetic screening have contributed tremendously in elucidating the pathology and genetic variability associated with FTD and ALS. TAR DNA binding protein [TARDBP or TDP-43] and the fused in sarcoma gene [FUS] and their implication in these disorders belong to the most important recent discoveries. FTD and ALS are the focus of this review which aims to: 1. summarize clinical features by describing the diagnostic criteria and specific symptomatology, 2. describe the morphological aspects and related pathology, 3. describe the genetic factors associated with the diseases and 4. summarize the current status of clinical trials and treatment options. A better understanding of the clinical, pathological and genetic features characterizing FTD and ALS will shed light into overlaps among these two disorders and the underpinning mechanisms that contribute to their onset and development. Advancements in the knowledge of the biology of these two disorders will help developing novel and, hopefully, more effective diagnostic and treatment options.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据