4.2 Article

Tyrosol and Hydroxytyrosol Two Main Components of Olive Oil, Protect N2a Cells Against Amyloid-β-Induced Toxicity. Involvement of the NF-κB Signaling

期刊

CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 543-551

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/156720511796391845

关键词

Antioxidants; phenolic compounds; Alzheimer's disease; NF-kappa B; glutathione

资金

  1. NSERC (Canada)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. Recently, a number of epidemiological studies have shown that some dietary factors such as low antioxidants and vitamins intake could increase the risk of AD. In the opposite, diets rich in unsaturated fatty acids, in polyphenols, vitamins and antioxidants were identified as preventive factors. Several studies have reported that adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MeDi) was associated with a reduction in incidence of dementia. The beneficial effect of MeDi may be the result of the association of some individual and non-identified food components and high consumption of olive oil. In this study we have investigated the protective effects of two components of olive oil, tyrosol (Tyr) and hydroxytyrosol (OH-Tyr), against A beta-induced toxicity. In cultured neuroblastoma N2a cells, we found that A beta(25-35) (100 mu g/ml) treatment induced a decrease of glutathione (GSH), and the activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B and cell death. Our results demonstrated that the number of cell death decreased when cells were co-treated with A beta and Tyr or OH-Tyr. However, neither of these phenolic compounds was able to prevent the decrease of GSH induced by H2O2 or A beta. We found that the increase in the nuclear translocation of the NF-kappa B subunits after A beta exposure was attenuated in the presence of Tyr or OH-Tyr. These results identified two individual food components of the MeDi as neuroprotective agent against A beta and their potential involvement in the beneficial effect of the MeDi for the prevention of AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据