4.3 Article

PCOR, CER, and CBPR: Alphabet Soup or Complementary Fields of Health Research?

期刊

CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 493-496

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cts.12064

关键词

outcomes research; community; patient centered research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) and community- based participatory research (CBPR) are two fields of research that do not have a history of strong collaboration. However, CER and CBPR researchers could benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration to design and implement relevant, timely, action-oriented research. This commentary explores field-specific definitions of stakeholders and then outlines various roles stakeholders might play within grant-funded research. Questions such as What stakeholders should be involved? and How are stakeholders involved? are addressed. The goal of this commentary is to highlight how the expertise and experiences of CBPR investigators can enhance the field of CER and to describe strategies for encouraging stakeholder involvement in CER research through the lens of CBPR. It is recommended that a team-based approach to conducting stakeholder-engaged CER encourages multiple stakeholders and end users to contribute their diverse expertise to the research process and contributes to the development of research with an increased likelihood of improving patient health and healthcare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据