4.3 Article

Burnout Among Early Career Clinical Investigators

期刊

CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 186-188

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00202.x

关键词

burnout; clinical researchers; exhaustion; cynicism; under-represented minority; African-American; Hispanic; female; clinical research training programs

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1 RR024153]
  2. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
  3. National Cancer Institute [K07-CA114315, R01-CA140150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Burnout is a pervasive problem among clinicians. However, little is known about burnout among early career clinical investigators, who must balance clinical responsibilities with challenges related to research. We aimed to determine the prevalence of and demographic associations with burnout in a cohort of early career clinical investigators. A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to 179 trainees at the University of Pittsburgh Institute for Clinical Research Education in 2007-2008. We used chi-square analyses and Fisher's exact test to determine whether associations between demographic characteristics and burnout were significant. Of the participants, 29 (16%) reported feeling burned out. Burnout was more prevalent among those over 35 years of age relative to their younger counterparts (29% vs. 13%, p = 0.01) and among females relative to males (22% vs. 10%, p = 0.03). With regard to race and ethnicity, burnout was most common among underrepresented minorities (30%) followed by Caucasians (18%) and Asians (3%); these differences were significant (p = 0.02). Considering the early career status of these research trainees, rates of burnout were concerning. Certain demographic subgroups-including older trainees, females, and underrepresented minorities-had particularly high rates of burnout and may benefit from interventions that provide them with skills needed to sustain successful clinical research careers. Clin Trans Sci 2010; Volume 3: 186-188

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据