4.3 Review

Colorectal Cancer Is a Paracrine Deficiency Syndrome Amenable to Oral Hormone Replacement Therapy

期刊

CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 163-167

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00040.x

关键词

colorectal cancer; paracrine deficiency syndrome; hormone replacement therapy

资金

  1. NIH [CA75123, CA95026]
  2. Targeted Diagnostic and Therapeutics, Inc.
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Health
  4. Prevent Cancer Foundation
  5. Measey Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most commonly lost gene products in colorectal carcinogenesis include the paracrine hormones guanylin and uroguanylin, the endogenous ligands for guanylyl cyclase C (GCC), the intestinal receptor for diarrheagenic bacterial enterotoxins. Recently, GCC-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP) signaling has emerged as a principal regulator of proliferation, genetic integrity, and metabolic programming in normal human enterocytes and colon cancer cells. Elimination of GCC in mice produced hyperplasia of the proliferating compartment associated with increases in the rapidly cycling progenitor cells and reprogrammed enterocyte metabolism, with a shift from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis. In addition, in the colons of mice carrying mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli gene Apc (Apc(Min/+)) or exposed to the carcinogen azoxymethane, elimination of GCC increased tumor initiation and promotion by disrupting genomic integrity and releasing cell cycle restriction. These previously unrecognized roles for GCC as a fundamental regulator of intestinal homeostasis and as an intestinal tumor suppressor suggest that receptor dysregulation reflecting paracrine hormone insufficiency is a key event during the initial stages of colorectal tumorigenesis. Together with the uniform overexpression of GCC in human tumors, these novel roles for GCC underscore the potential of oral replacement with GCC ligands for a targeted prevention and therapy of colorectal cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据