4.7 Article

Studies on crystallization kinetics of bimodal long chain branched polylactides

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 2452-2461

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ce42319k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21174139]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB025901]
  3. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the effects of long chain branching (LCB) on the crystallization kinetics of polylactides (PLA), a series of long chain branched PLA samples have been prepared, which have been proven to be bimodal of linear PLA and long chain branched PLA with different branching degrees. The crystallization kinetics of these LCB PLA samples have been investigated using polarized optical microscopy (POM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The POM results show that the spherulitic growth rates of the LCB PLA samples are lower than that of the linear PLA precursor and the PLA spherulitic growth rate decreases with increasing branching degree at each isothermal crystallization temperature. In contrast, the nucleation density increases with increasing branching degree. The crystallization kinetics from the POM observation are analyzed using the Hoffman-Lauritzen theory. In the studied temperature range, both linear PLA and LCB PLA samples crystallize according to the Regime II mechanism. The nucleation constant (Kg) and fold surface free energy (se) decrease with increasing branching degree, suggesting that the LCB PLA samples have lower free energy barriers for nucleation than the linear PLA precursor. Analysis of the DSC data by the Avrami equation indicates that the crystallization of both the linear PLA and LCB PLA samples follows a three-dimensional crystal growth. The half crystallization time reduces with increasing branching degree and the overall crystallization rates for the LCB PLA samples are higher than that of linear PLA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据