4.5 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Insulin receptor A and Sirtuin 1 synergistically improve learning and spatial memory following chronic salidroside treatment during hypoxia (Retracted article. See vol. 165, pg. 277, 2023)

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 135, 期 2, 页码 332-346

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13225

关键词

hypoxia; insulin receptor; memory; mitochondrial biogenesis; salidroside; Sirtuin 1

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board [SB/FT/LS-01/2013]
  2. Defence Research & Development Organization
  3. Ministry of Defence, Govt of India
  4. Department of Science & Technology, Govt of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia has been reported to cause hippocampal neurodegeneration resulting in learning and memory deficits. In the present study, we investigated the potential of salidroside, a glucoside derivative of tyrosol, in ameliorating hypoxia-induced neurodegeneration and memory impairment. Morris water maze test showed improvement in learning and spatial memory of salidroside-treated hypoxic rats correlating with increased dendritic intersections and arborization. Salidroside administration increased phosphorylation of insulin receptor subunit A (IRA) at Y972, Y1162/63, and Y1146 sites and subsequent activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) subunit isoforms pAMPK1 and pAMPK2 resulting in mitochondrial biogenesis. Contrarily, silencing of IRA in salidroside-supplemented hypoxic hippocampal cells could not improve cell viability or alter pAMPK1 and pAMPK2 expression. Rats administered with salidroside showed elevated expression of phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein in the hippocampus. Salidroside administration also resulted in increased sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) activity through a cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1)-regulated mechanism that was independent of pIRA. Taken together, these findings suggest a synergistic role of pIRA and SIRT1 in salidroside-mediated neuroprotection, mitochondrial biogenesis, and cognitive improvement during hypoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据