4.7 Article

Controlled growth of nickel nanocrystal arrays and their field electron emission performance enhancement via removing adsorbed gas molecules

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 1296-1306

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ce26456k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National High-Tech R & D Program of China (863) [2011AA050504]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [10ZR1416300]
  3. Foundation for SMC Excellent Young Teacher, 'PCSIRT'
  4. Analytical and Testing Center in Shanghai Jiao Tong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the fabrication of Ni nanocone arrays on Ni foil substrate as well as gas exposure field electron emission experiments using them as cold electron cathodes. The self-assembly of nanoscale building blocks into organized conical superstructures is achieved by the assistance of oriented attachment. These Ni nanocones grow only along the [111] direction and to be controlled mainly rely on two factors: the surface energies and the lattice matching extent of the attached surfaces. On the basis of the equilibrium between nucleation rate and crystallization rate, Ni nanocones with different aspect ratio (0.2-2.2) are prepared by adjusting the concentration of hydrazine hydrate and growth temperature. Field electron emission measurements indicate that the as-grown Ni nanocone array is an excellent field emitter exhibiting low turn-on field, high current density, and large field enhancement factor due to sharper tips and better contact with the Ni substrate. Meanwhile, we find that adsorbed gas molecules greatly hindered the field electron emission performance of the Ni nanocone array, and oxygen and nitrogen gases show different suppressive behaviors, which strongly correlate with the electronegativity of the individual species. Repeated applying voltage or 'vacuum J-E annealing' could significantly improve field emission properties and stability, which is attributed to desorption of the adsorbed gas molecules through Joule heating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据