4.7 Article

Highly branched organic microcrystals via self-organization and growth kinetics manipulation

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 8124-8127

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ce26348c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [91027021, 91027041]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51173124, 51172151, 50903059, 50825304]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB933500, 2010CB934500, 2011CB808400]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20093201120020]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate the first investigation of highly branched small-molecular organic microcrystals via self-organization of crystallites at the nucleation stage and then growth kinetics manipulation at the crystal growth stage. Temperature control was found to be critical in the formation of the branched structures. At higher temperature (25 degrees C), crystallites follow the conventional growth route to minimize the total surface energy under thermodynamic control, and grow into polyhedral crystals. While at lower temperature (15 degrees C),crystallites would follow the reversed crystal growth route and preferentially self-aggregate into well-defined cage-like cubes. The branched octapod-shaped microcrystals are formed with nucleation at 15 degrees C for crystallites to self-organize into cube-within-cube aggregates, and then subsequent anistropic overgrowth from each corner of eight cubes at 25 degrees C. The higher growth rate along < 111 > directions induces the formation of the octapod structures. Surfactant was also found to encourage the secondary branching on the octapod-shaped architectures. This work provides a simple approach to synthesize organic microcrystals with a highly branched structure, which are expected to be useful as building blocks in nanoelectronics and nanocircuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据