4.7 Article

Tuning silver(I) coordination architectures by ligands design: from dinuclear, trinuclear, to 1D and 3D frameworks

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 1866-1874

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b810773d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NNSF of China [20531040, 50673043]
  2. 973 Program of China [2007CB815305]
  3. Natural Science Fund of Tianjin, China [07JCZDJC00500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In our efforts to tune the structures of Ag-I complexes by ligand modification, six structurally related ligands: 1,2-bis(triazol-1-ylmethyl) benzene (L-1), 1,3-bis(triazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene (L-2), 1,4-bis( triazol-1-ylmethyl) benzene (L-3), 1,3,5-tri(triazol-1-ylmethyl)-2,4,6-trimethylbenzene (L-4), 1,4-bis[3-( 2-pyridyl)-pyrazol-1-ylmethyl] naphthalene (L-5), and 9,10-bis(benzimidazol-1-ylmethyl) anthracene (L-6) have been designed and used to react with Ag-I salts to form six new complexes: {[Ag-2(L-1)(2)](BF4)(2)(H2O)} (1), [Ag-2(L-2)(NO3)(2)](n) (2), [Ag(L-3)(NO3)](n) (3), {[Ag-3(L-4)(2)](SiF6)(1.5)(H2O)(3.5)} (4), {[Ag-2(L-5)(2)](NO3)(2)(H2O)} (5), and {[Ag-2(L-6)(2)](NO3)(2)(CH3OH)(2)} (6). All the complexes have been structurally characterized by IR and X-ray diffraction. Structural analyses show that complexes 1, 5, and 6 possess dinuclear structures, which extend to infinite coordination networks linked by Ag center dot center dot center dot N, C-H center dot center dot center dot O, or pi-pi weak interactions. 2 is a 3D chiral coordination polymer with (10,3)-a topology, and 4 forms a trinuclear cage structure, which further connected by Ag center dot center dot center dot Ag weak interactions to form a 1D supramolecule, while 3 exhibits an infinite 1D chain structure. The structures of complexes 1-6 span from dinuclear, trinuclear, 1D, to 3D network, which indicates that ligands play important roles in the formation of such coordination architectures. Furthermore, the CD spectrum, thermal, and fluorescent properties of the chiral complex 2 have been investigated in the solid state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据