4.7 Article

Inclusion Complexes and Solvates of Buckycatcher, a Versatile Molecular Host with Two Corannulene Pincers

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 2633-2639

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg5003176

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-04ER15514]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1212441]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [1212441] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Chemistry [1337594] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-04ER15514] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray crystal structure study of cocrystallites of buckycatcher (2, C60H28) demonstrates a remarkable versatility of the molecular clip to accommodate guest molecules of various sizes and shapes. As demonstrated by the B97-D calculations, concave concave conformation of the clip seems to be preferred for the gas-phase 1:1 inclusion complexes of 2 with a series of potential guests. However, the unprecedented concave convex conformations were found in two of the reported solvates [i.e., 2 center dot 0.75(p-xylene) and 2 center dot 2PhNO(2)]. Three of the studied inclusion complexes with the highest calculated gas-phase binding energies (1,3,5-trinitrobenzene@ 2, and the previously reported C-60@2 and C-70@2) exhibit the analogous 1:1 supramolecular arrangements in the crystal state. On the other hand, p-xylene and PhNO2 solvates as well as DDQ/MeCN cocrystallite exhibit quite different stoichiometries and supramolecular arrangements, presumably enforced by the crystal packing forces. Dramatic variations of the intercentroid distances between the central five-membered rings of the corannulene pincers in the inclusion complexes (from 7.87 to 11.51 angstrom) expose an impressive flexibility of the buckycatcher tether.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据