4.7 Article

Origin of Solubility Behavior of Polar π-Conjugated Crystals in Mixed Solvent Systems

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 6024-6032

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg501197m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Midcareer Researcher Program [NRF-2013R1A2A2A01007232]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2014R1A5A1009799]
  3. Ministry of Education
  4. Agency for Defense Development and Defense Acquisition Program Administration - Ministry of National Defense, the Korea government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the origins of solubility behavior of polar p-conjugated crystals in mixed solvent systems and the influence of nonpolar aromatic solvents on solubility and crystal growth characteristics. In solvent mixtures of polar nonaromatic methanol and nonpolar aromatic toluene (or o-xylene), solubility of three analogous polar crystals, consisting of a mu-conjugated phenyltriene bridge between electron donor and acceptor groups, shows a maximum at the midpoint of composition. The maximal solubility mole fraction in such mixed solvent systems can be as high as 67 times as that in a single solvent. For comparison, a mixed solvent system consisting of only polar nonaromatic solvents (methanol and acetonitrile) is also examined. Main intermolecular interactions between the solute and solvent molecules in mixed solvent systems, related to the solubility behavior, are experimentally provided by the UVvis absorption spectroscopy and H-1 NMR measurements. In the presence of aromatic solvents, additional strong interactions between the solvent and pi-conjugated solute molecules, such as face-to-face and edge-to-face pi-pi interactions including p center dot center dot center dot HOAr hydrogen bonds are clearly observed. The aromatic characteristics of solvents also importantly influence the morphology and polymorphism of single crystals grown by solution crystal-growth methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据