4.7 Article

[TM(en)3][SnSb4S9] (TM = Ni, Co): 3D Chiral Framework of Mixed Main-Group Metals and [Mn(dien)2]2Sb4S9: 1D Chains with Mixed-Valent Sb Centers

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 101-109

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg401208p

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21101075, 21201081]
  2. Research Foundation for Excellent Young and Middle-Aged Scientists of Shandong Province [BS2011CL009, BS2012CL008]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M521321]
  4. Post Doctoral Innovation Project of Shandong Province [201303097]
  5. High Educational Science & Research Foundation of Shandong Province [J11LB52, J13D58]
  6. Scientific Research and Technological Development Program of Jining City [20125014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new isostructural quaternary tin(IV) antimony(III) sulfides, [TM(en)(3)][SnSb4S9] [TM = Ni (1), Co (2); en = ethylenediamine], and one mixed-valent thioantimonate (III and V), [Mn(dien)(2)](2)Sb4S9 (3, dien = diethylenetriamine),. have been solvothermally synthesized and structurally characterized. In the structures of 1 and 2, four neighboring SbS3 trigonal pyramids are condensed via corner-sharing to form bow-like Sb4S9 tetramers, which are further interconnected by SnS6 octahedra into the three-dimensional (3D) chiral [SnSb4S9](2-) framework with two types of one-dimensional (ID) chiral channels along the c axis. Compound 3 features a 3D network composed of ID anionic [Sb4S9](4-) chains and [Mn(dien)(2)](2+) complexes interconnected via various hydrogen bonds. The most interesting structural feature of 3 is the presence of two different oxidation states of antimony centers in the ID [Sb4S9](4-) chain with three different types of coordination environments, respectively. The optical absorption spectra indicate that the band gaps of compounds 1, 2, and 3 are 2.07, 2.04, and 2.29 eV, respectively. The thermal stabilities and magnetic properties of the title compounds are also studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据