4.7 Article

Framework Isomerism in Vanadium Metal-Organic Frameworks: MIL-88B(V) and MIL-101(V)

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 5036-5044

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg4012058

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  2. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA) through the Berzelii Center EXSE-LENT
  3. Goran Gustafsson Foundation
  4. Consortium for Crystal Chemistry (C3), Rontgen-Angstrom Cluster
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  6. Magnus Bergvalls Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two families of metal organic frameworks (MOFs), MIL-88 and MIL-101 built by trinuclear transition metal (TM) clusters (TM = Cr, Fe, or Sc), have been known for several years, but their syntheses are often reported separately. In fact, these MOFs are polymorphs, or framework isomers: they are assembled from the same metal secondary building units and organic linkers, but the connectivity of these components differs. Here we report for the first time the synthesis of the vanadium MOF MIL-88B(V) and compare its synthesis parameters to those of MIL-47(V) and the recently reported MIL-101(V). The properties of MIL-88B(V) and MIL-101(V) are remarkably different. MIL-88B(V) can breathe and is responsive to different solvents, while MIL-101(V) is rigid and contains mesoporous cages. MIL-101(V) exhibits the highest specific surface area among vanadium MOFs discovered so far. In addition, both MIL-88B(V) and MIL-101(V) transform to MIL-47 at higher temperatures. We have also identified the key synthesis parameters that control the formation of MIL-88B(V), MIL-101(V), and MIL-47: temperature, time, and pH. This relates to the rate of reaction between the metal and linkers, which has been monitored by ex situ X-ray powder diffraction and V K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy during MOF synthesis. It is therefore important to fully study the synthesis conditions to improve our understanding of framework isomerism in MOFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据