4.7 Article

Influence of Solvent Reducing Ability on Copper Sulfide Crystal Phase

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 4059-4065

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg400895d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Franklin & Marshall College
  2. Henry and Camille Dreyfus Foundation
  3. NSF CAREER award [CHE-1149646]
  4. National Science Foundation [EAR-0923224]
  5. [DMR-05-20020]
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0959361] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Chemistry
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1149646] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper sulfide particles across a wide range of stoichiometries are obtained depending on the ratio of cosolvents from which they are grown. Copper sulfides are abundant, low-cost materials with phase-dependent properties relevant to solar energy conversion and (opto)electronic devices. For this reaction, the reducing ability of dodecanethiol versus oleic acid affects the speciation of the precursors, as determined using UV-vis absorption spectroscopy. The ratio of dodecanethiol to oleic acid in the synthetic medium affects the solid-state structure and stoichiometry, as determined by powder X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and detailed investigation of the band edge positions and plasmon behavior using visible-NIR optical absorption spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. A range of phases was obtained, including monoclinic chalcocite, tetragonal chalcocite, digenite, and covellite. The thermodynamic relationships between these phases were elucidated using equilibration experiments, revealing methods for postsynthetic property alteration. Particle size and morphology were also affected by solvent ratio, as shown using scanning or transmission electron microscopy. Oleic acid accelerated particle growth and resulted in particles with an unusual faceted shape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据