4.7 Article

Seven Copper Coordination Polymers Based on 5-Iodo-Isophthalic Acid: Halogen-Related Bonding and N-Donor Auxiliary Ligands Modulating Effect

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 3353-3364

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg400033s

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20901070]
  2. Zhengzhou University (P. R. China)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of copper coordination polymers of [Cu-3(OH)(2)(5-iipa)(2)(phen)(3)(H2O)center dot 4.5(H2O)](n) (1) [Cu(5-iipa)(phen)(H2O)](n) (2), [Cu(5-iipa)(bpe)center dot 2(H2O)](n) (3), [Cu(5-iipa)(p-bix)](n) (4), [Cu(5-iipa)(bbi)](n) (5), [Cu-2(5-iipa)(2)(bbi)center dot 0.5(H2O)](n) (6), and [Cu(5-iipa)(bpp)center dot H2O](n) (7) (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, bpe = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane, p-bix = 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)-benzene, bbi = 1,1'-(1,4-butanediyl)bis(imidazole), bpp = 1,3-bi(4-pyridyl)propane) were hydro(solvo)thermally synthesized through the reaction of divalent copper salts, 5-iodo-isophthalic acid (5-H(2)iipa), and N-donor ancillary ligands. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses on these complexes revealed that noncovalent interactions were found to be predominant in constructing these supramolecular architectures. Compounds 1-5 all possess three-dimensional (3D) supramolecular structures based on O center dot center dot center dot I, I center dot center dot center dot I, I center dot center dot center dot pi, and pi...pi interactions. Compound 6 exhibits a complicated three-dimensional (3D) framework with a new (6.7(2))(2)(6(3).7(2).8)(2)(6(3).7(8).8(2).9(2)) topology, while 7 features a 3D 3-fold interpenetrating network with a (4,4)-connected (3.8(5))(3(2).8(3).9) topology. A systematically structural description of these polymers indicates both halogen-related interactions and N-donor auxiliary ligands have a significant effect on the coordination network assembly. Their thermal analysis, X-ray diffraction, and UV-vis absorption spectra have also been investigated as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据