4.7 Article

Nucleation

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 5007-5019

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg1011633

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI-NIH
  2. NSF [MCB 0843726]
  3. ACS
  4. NASA
  5. Welch Foundation
  6. Normal Heckerman Advanced Research Program [003652 0078-2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crystallization starts with nucleation and control of nucleation is crucial for the control of the number size perfection, polymorphism and other characteristics of crystalline materials [his is particularly true for crystallization in solution, which is an essential part of processes in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries and a major step in physiological and pathological phenomena There have been significant recent advances in the understanding of the mechanism of nucleation of crystals in solution The foremost of these are the two-step mechanism of nucleation and the notion of the solution-crystal spinodal According to the two-step mechanism, the crystalline nucleus appears inside pre-existing metastable clusters of size several hundred nanometers, which consist of dense liquid and are suspended in the solution While initially proposed for protein crystals, the applicability of this mechanism has been demonstrated for small molecule organic materials, colloids polymers, and biominerals This mechanism helps to explain several long-standing puzzles of crystal nucleation in solution nucleation rates which are many orders of magnitude lower than theoretical predictions, the significance of the dense protein liquid, and other, At high supersaturations typical of most crystallizing systems, the generation of crystal embryos occurs in the spinodal regime where the nucleation barrier is negligible The solution-crystal spinodal helps to clarify the role of heterogeneous substrates in nucleation and the selection of crystalline polymorphs Importantly, these ideas provide powerful tools for control of the nucleation process by varying the solution thermodynamic parameters

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据