4.7 Article

A Series of Lead(II) Complexes with pi-pi Stackings: Structural Diversities by Varying the Ligands

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 1894-1911

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg801085d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Chinese University [NCET-05-0320]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Teams in Chinese University
  3. Analysis and Testing Foundation of Northeast Normal University
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  5. Postdoctoral Foundation of Northeast Normal University
  6. NENU'S Scientific Innovation Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Twelve structurally diverse complexes, [Pb-2(pzp)(2)(adip)(NO3)(2)] 1, [Pb(pzp)(glu)] 2, [Pb(pzp)(chdc)]center dot[Pb(pzp)(chdc)]center dot pzp center dot H2O 3, [Pb-2(ndc)(2)(pzp)(2)(H2O)]center dot 0.5H(2)O 4, [Pb(pzp)(1,3-bdc)(H2O)(0.5)]center dot H2O 5, [Pb(pzp)(1,2-bdc)]center dot H2O 6, [Pb-2(ptc)(2)(adip)-(NO3)(2)] 7, [Pb(ptc)(glu)] 8, [Pb(ptc)(chdc)] 9, [Pb(ptc)(dpdc)](2) 10, [Pb(ptc)(1,3-bdc)]-2.5H(2)O 11, and [Pb(ptc)(1,4-bdc)]center dot 0.75H(2)O 12, where H(2)adip = adipic acid, H(2)glu = glutaric acid, H(2)chdc = 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, H(2)ndc = 1,4-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid, 1,4-H(2)bdc = benzene-1,4-dicarboxylic acid, H(2)dpdc = 2,2'-diphenyldicarboxylic acid, 1,3-H(2)bdc benzene-1,3-dicarboxylic acid, 1,2-H(2)bdc = benzene-1,2-dicarboxylic acid, pzp = pyrazino[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline, and ptc = 2-phenyl-1H-1,3,7,8,-tetraaza-cyclopenta[l]-phenanthrene, have been hydrothermally synthesized. Compounds 7 and 10 possess dinuclear structures, which are further extended by pi-pi interactions to form supramolecular layers and chains, respectively. 1-6, 8-9, and 11-12 feature chain structures, which are then stacked by pi-pi interactions to result in 2D or 3D supramolecular architectures. The structural differences among such complexes show that the organic acids and neutral chelating ligands have important influences on the structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据