4.3 Article

Pinacidil enhances survival of cryopreserved human embryonic stem cells

期刊

CRYOBIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 3, 页码 298-305

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2011.10.002

关键词

Human embryonic stem cell; Cryopreservation; Pinacidil

资金

  1. MRC
  2. ESTOOLS consortium under European Union [LSHG-CT-2006-018739]
  3. BBSRC [BB/D524908/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G0801059] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D524908/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0801059] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can be maintained as undifferentiated cells in vitro and induced to differentiate into a variety of somatic cell types. Thus, hESCs provide a source of differentiated cell types that could be used to replace diseased cells of a tissue. The efficient cryopreservation of hESCs is important for establishing effective stem cell banks, however, conventional slow freezing methods usually lead to low rates of recovery after thawing cells and their replating in culture. We have established a method for recovering cryopreserved hESCs using pinacidil and compared it to a method that employs the ROCK inhibitory Y-27632. We show that pinacidil is similar to Y-27632 in promoting survival of hESCs after cryopreservation. The cells exhibited normal hESC morphology, retained a normal karyotype, and expressed characteristic hESC markers (OCT4, SSEA3, SSEA4 and TRA-1-60). Moreover, the cells retained the capacity to differentiate into derivatives of all three embryonic germ layers as demonstrated by differentiation through embryoid body formation. Pinacidil has been used for many years as a vasodilator drug to treat hypertension and its manufacture and traceability are well defined. It is also considerably cheaper than Y-27632. Thus, the use of pinacidil offers an efficient method for recovery of cryopreserved dissociated human ES cells. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据