4.5 Article

Evaluation of Grain Yield and Three Physiological Traits in 30 Spring Wheat Genotypes across Three Irrigation Regimes

期刊

CROP SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 110-121

出版社

CROP SCIENCE SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2011.03.0117

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-68002-30029]
  2. Idaho Wheat Commission
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. '111' project in China [111-2-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate field evaluation of yield-related physiological traits is critical for selecting high yield and drought resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). To characterize grain yield and three physiological traits for 30 spring wheat genotypes, field experiments with three irrigation regimes were conducted in 2009 and 2010 field seasons. Our study suggests that Feekes 11.2 is the optimal stage to evaluate flag leaf senescence (FLS) and canopy temperature (CT) when making selections for high grain yield and drought resistance among wheat genotypes. Flag leaf carbon isotope discrimination (CID) was positively correlated with grain yield, whereas FLS and CT were negatively correlated with grain yield. The three traits together explained 92% of the total phenotypic variation of grain yield. Selected genotypes were classified into four groups based on yield performance across irrigation regimes. High-yield genotypes IDO599, 'Alturas', and IDO702 produced high grain yield across different water conditions; drought-resistant genotypes 'Agawam', 'McNeal', and 'Alpowa' produced higher grain yield under the nonirrigated regime. High yield of those genotypes was contributed by good performance of physiological traits such as late FLS, great CID, or low CT or combinations of these traits. Preliminary results indicate that using physiological traits to estimate yield performance can be effective, and selecting suitable genotypes for different water environments may be crucial for improving yield productivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据