4.5 Article

Salinity Tolerance of Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars and Selections Using an Overhead Irrigated Screening Technique

期刊

CROP SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 2846-2857

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2011.03.0174

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. United States Golf Association
  2. OJ Noer Foundation
  3. International Turf Producers Foundation
  4. New Jersey Turfgrass Foundation
  5. Rutgers Center for Turfgrass Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An increasing amount of reclaimed water is being used in turfgrass management; however, reclaimed water is often high in total dissolved salts and can result in salt stress injury and poor turf quality. The objective of this study was to use an overhead irrigated greenhouse screening technique to identify Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) cultivars with increased salinity tolerance, using growth parameters and physiological measurements. Salt treatments were applied using an overhead sprinkler system. Twenty-four Kentucky bluegrasses and Texas bluegrass (Poa arachnifera Torr.) x Kentucky bluegrass hybrids were established in 100% sand tanks and evaluated at a control (1 dS m(-1)) and three salinity concentrations (3, 6, and 9 dS m(-1)) for a total of 10 wk. Plants were arranged in a split plot design with three replications. Percent green ratings and digital images were collected weekly and clipping weights were collected biweekly. Root and shoot weights were taken at the end of the study. Significant differences were observed between salinity treatments and cultivars. The cultivars Eagleton, Moonshadow, Fairfax, Cabernet, and Liberator exhibited the most salt tolerance, having the least decrease in growth parameters compared to the control plants (1 dS m(-1)), while cultivars Baron, A03-84, and A03-TB246 were the most salt sensitive when compared to control plants. Relative water content and photochemical efficiency were useful to quantify physiological differences between tolerant and susceptible cultivars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据