4.5 Article

Effects of fruit dipping in hydrochloric acid then rinsing in water on fruit decay and browning of longan fruit

期刊

CROP PROTECTION
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 1184-1189

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.05.014

关键词

Longan; Hydrochloric acid; Disease incidence (%); Browning index; Eating quality

类别

资金

  1. Office of National Research Council of Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to find alternative methods for the control of pericarp browning in longan fruits (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) cv. Daw in order to replace the use of sulfur dioxide (SO2). Experiments were conducted by dipping fruits in 1.5 N HCl solution (pH 0.21) for 20 min followed by draining. The effects of subsequent rinsing in water were also investigated. Untreated fruits and SO2 fumigated fruits were used as controls. Fruits from each treatment were then packaged in commercial perforated plastic baskets and stored at 3 +/- 1 degrees C, 85% RH for 60 days. It was found that dipping the fruits in HCl controlled disease development compared with the untreated fruits. In addition, dipping the fruits in HCl as well as fumigating with SO2 gave the best control of pericarp browning. After 5 days, the pericarp of untreated fruits became brown. Dipping fruits in HCl without rinsing reduced pericarp and juice pH and increased titratable acidity which lowered eating quality. Sensory analysis was carried out to determine aril color as well as appearance, firmness, flavor and taste. Dipping in 1.5 N HCl for 20 min and rinsing exhibited higher efficacy than dipping for 0, 10 or 15 min in controlling fruit decay and maintaining fruit color and eating qualities during 7 days storage at 25 degrees C following 45 days storage at 5 +/- 1 degrees C. Therefore, dipping in 1.5 N HCl for 20 min, followed by rinsing in water can be considered for commercial application in extending shelf life, decreasing fruit decay and maintaining fruit quality of longan fruits. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据