4.5 Article

Farmers' competence and training needs on pest management practices: Participation in extension workshops

期刊

CROP PROTECTION
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 934-939

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2009.07.007

关键词

Diffusion of knowledge; Extension workshops; Iran; Karaj; Pest management; Training needs

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A survey of farmers in Karaj, Iran explored impacts of extension workshops on farmers' level of competence on pest management practices and identified farmers' needs for pest management training. Three groups of farmers, each one consisting of 30 individuals, were included in the study. Group A included farmers who had recently participated in a local workshop for pest management, group B included farmers who had never participated in a similar workshop, but they were from the same town with farmers of group A (workshop participants) and had close contact with farmers of group A, and group C (control group) consisted of farmers who had never attended a similar workshop and were outside of this community. Training needs were assessed using the Borich Needs Assessment Model. The top three training needs for group A were on a) identification of pesticide application frequency, method of application, and amount, b) pesticide record keeping, and c) knowledge on pesticide selection. The top three training needs for group B were on a) awareness of different pesticide products, b) identification of pesticide application frequency, method of application, and amount, and c) identification of various types of insect damage. The top three training needs for farmers of group C were on a) knowledge of chemical/cultural/biological pest control options, b) biological control of pests, and c) differentiation among fungal, viral, and bacterial diseases. Group A showed the highest level of competence for all three areas of pest management practices (pest identification, pesticide management, and IPM principles), whereas little spread of the acquired knowledge was observed from group A to other community members. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据