4.5 Article

Crop rotations with Mi gene resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars for management of root-knot nematodes in plastic houses

期刊

CROP PROTECTION
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 662-667

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2009.03.015

关键词

Meloidogyne spp; Crop rotation; Solanum esculentum; Yield

类别

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia (MCYT) from Spain [AGL2004-01207/AGR]
  2. European Union (FEDER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four crop rotations including the Mi resistant tomato cv. Monika (R) and the susceptible cv. Durinta (S), were assessed for three consecutive cropping seasons in three unheated plastic houses located in northeastern (Barcelona), east (Eivissa) and south-western (Cadiz) Spain. Tomatoes were cultivated from March to July 2005 (1), 2006 (2) and 2007 (3) at Barcelona and Eivissa, and from March to July 2006 (1), September 2006 to February 2007 (2) and March to July 2007 (3) at Cadiz. The crop sequences in the rotation were R1R2S3, R1S2S3 S1R2S3 and S1S2S3. Nematode population densities in soil and roots, reproduction indices, and tomato yield were compared for each cropping cycle and rotation. Average pre-plant nematode densities (Pi) at the beginning of the study were 247, 7, and 172 juveniles per 250 cm(3) of soil at Barcelona, Eivissa and Cadiz, respectively. The Mi resistant tomato cv. Monika suppressed M. javanica at Barcelona and Eivissa, and M. arenaria and M. incognita at Cadiz, and prevented nematode population increases by more than 90% compared with the susceptible cv. Durinta. At Barcelona, the 3-year average tomato yield increased by 2.6 kg m(-2) in the rotations including at least one resistant tomato crop, and by 6.1 kg m(-2) when the resistant cultivar was cropped for two consecutive years. However, no differences in yield were found at Eivissa due to low Pi, nor at Cadiz where the resistant cultivar was poorly adapted to the agroclimatic conditions of the area. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据