4.1 Article

Illness Perception and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study

期刊

CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 583-593

出版社

MEDICINSKA NAKLADA
DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.583

关键词

-

资金

  1. Croatian Ministry of Science, Education, and Sports [108-1080317-0280]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To investigate illness perception in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with the degree of control over relevant cardiovascular risk factors. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was performed from June 2007 to March 2008. A stratified random sample of 46 Croatian general practitioners was asked to select, using systematic sampling, the first 6 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged >= 18 years who visited them for consultation during the study period. Data on 250 patients included patient illness perception assessment (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, IPQ), cardiovascular risk factors, and socio-demographic data. Results The patients' mean age was 63.0 +/- 10.9 years and mean duration of diabetes was 9.3 +/- 7.8 years. The patients' illness perception assessment on an I I-point (0 to 10) scale showed the highest median scores(interquartile range): 10 (8 to 10) for timeline and 8 (7 to 9) for treatment control, followed by 7 (5 to 8) for personal control, 7 (5 to 9) for understanding, 5 Q to 7) for consequences, 6 (4 to 7) for concern: and 5 (2 to 7) for emotional response The lowest score was 3 (1 to 5) for identity. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the Brief IPQ item concern (P<0.001) was a significant predictor of body mass index; personal control (P<0.001) and concern (P=0.048) were significant predictors of fasting blood glucose; treatment control (P=0.009) was a significant predictor of total cholesterol; and understanding (P=0.010) was a significant predictor of blood pressure. Conclusion As patients 'beliefs seem to be associated with the degree of control over cardiovascular risk factors, they should be included in routine clinical assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据