4.6 Review

Body composition changes during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: A 2-year prospective study

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 172-177

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.06.006

关键词

Prostate cancer; Androgen deprivation therapy; Body composition; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

资金

  1. NIH/NIDDKD [K24 DK062895-03]
  2. NIH/NIA [T32 AG021885]
  3. The University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Research Center [CTRC-U111 RR024153]
  4. CaPCURE foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Little is known about the long-term impact of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on body composition in men with prostate cancer. We compared body composition parameters in men with non-metastatic prostate cancer on or not on therapy with healthy, age-matched controls at baseline and monitored changes over a 2-year period. Methods: We measured body fat mass and lean body mass in 81 men with prostate cancer on no ADT, 43 men on acute ADT (less than 6 months), 67 men on chronic ADT (more than 6 months) and 53 age-matched healthy controls. Measurements were performed every 6 months for 2 years. Results: Men with prostate cancer on acute ADT (mean 3 months) had significant gains in body fat mass [1499.56 +/- 322.28 g (mean +/- S.E.) after 12 months, 2167.15 +/- 676.45 g after 24 months, p < 0.01 for both] and losses in lean body mass (929.74 +/- 296.36 g after 12 months, 1785.81 +/- 501.31 g after 24 months, p < 0.01 for both) over 2 years. Men on chronic ADT (mean 31 months) had smaller but still significant body composition changes over 24 months. Changes in body composition in men on no ADT were small and healthy controls had no significant changes. Conclusions: Men with prostate cancer on ADT have significant gains in body fat mass and losses lean body mass over 2 years. These changes are most pronounced with initiation of ADT. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据