4.6 Review

Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 139-151

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/1040841X.2012.694410

关键词

Renewable energy; waste treatment; pathogen inactivation

资金

  1. Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF) Austria [P-200010]
  2. Red Meat Abattoir Association of South Africa
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 20001] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Slaughterhouse wastes are a potential reservoir of bacterial, viral, prion and parasitic pathogens, capable of infecting both animals and humans. A quick, cost effective and safe disposal method is thus essential in order to reduce the risk of disease following animal slaughter. Different methods for the disposal of such wastes exist, including composting, anaerobic digestion (AD), alkaline hydrolysis (AH), rendering, incineration and burning. Composting is a disposal method that allows a recycling of the slaughterhouse waste nutrients back into the earth. The high fat and protein content of slaughterhouse wastes mean however, that such wastes are an excellent substrate for AD processes, resulting in both the disposal of wastes, a recycling of nutrients (soil amendment with sludge), and in methane production. Concerns exist as to whether AD and composting processes can inactivate pathogens. In contrast, AH is capable of the inactivation of almost all known microorganisms. This review was conducted in order to compare three different methods of slaughterhouse waste disposal, as regards to their ability to inactivate various microbial pathogens. The intention was to investigate whether AD could be used for waste disposal (either alone, or in combination with another process) such that both energy can be obtained and potentially hazardous materials be disposed of.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据