4.7 Review

Mediterranean Diet and Cardiovascular Risk: Beyond Traditional Risk Factors

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2012.726660

关键词

Mediterranean diet; cardiovascular prevention; cardiovascular risk factors; olive oil

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2009-12270, SAF07-62005, FIS PI10/01041, PI10/02412]
  2. Consejeria de Economia, Innovacion y Ciencia, Proyectos de Investigacion de Excelencia, Junta de Andalucia [P06-CTS-01425, CTS5015, AGR922]
  3. Consejeria de Salud, Junta de Andalucia [07/43, PI0193/09, PI-0252/09, PI-0058/10]
  4. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)
  5. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [AGL2012/39615]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A strict adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) has repeatedly been linked to a low risk of cardiovascular disease in several situations. Initially, the mechanisms considered as possible causes of this were based on the effects of this dietary pattern on the so-called traditional risk factors (especially lipids and blood pressure). However, the high relative reduction in the prevalence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were not proportional to the limited findings about regulation of those traditional risk factors. In addition to several studies confirming the above effects, current research on the MedDiet is being focused on defining its effects on non-traditional risk factors, such as endothelial function, inflammation, oxidative stress, or on controlling the conditions which predispose people to cardiovascular events, such as obesity, metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes mellitus. In the current article, after briefly reviewing the known effects of the MedDiet on the traditional risk factors, we will mainly focus on reviewing the current evidence about the effects that this dietary pattern exerts on alternative factors, including postprandial lipemia or coagulation, among others, as well as providing a short review on future directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据