4.2 Article

Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Environmental Water by HPLC Combination with On-Line Solid-Phase Extraction Using Molecularly Imprinted Polymers

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 9578-9584

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2015.10495

关键词

Molecularly Imprinted Polymer (MIP); On-Line Solid Phase Extraction; HPLC; Phenolic Compound

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [9151200501000008]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry of China
  3. National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) was synthesized using halloysite nanotubes (HNT) as matrix, beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD) and methyl propyl acid (MAA) as functional monomers, and 2,4,6-TCP as template molecule by graft copolymerization. Infrared spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to characterize the as-synthesized imprinted polymer. The selective recognizability of the MIP towards four phenolic analogs were determined and the recognition coefficients for 2,4,6-TCP, 2,6-DCP, 4-CP and phenol were found to be 2.17, 1.85, 2.02 and 1.36, respectively. Using as the packing material of solid-phase extraction, the imprinted polymer has been applied to on-line extraction of the four phenolic compounds in environmental water. The corresponding analytical methods to determine these four phenolic compounds have been developed. Good linear relationships were obtained over the range of 0.05 similar to 5.0 mg.L-1. The average recoveries for spiked samples were in the range of 74.8 similar to 97.2%, and the detection limits for 2,4,6-TCP, 2,6-DCP, p-chlorophenol, phenol were 0.19, 0.20, 0.75, 0.73 mg.L-1, respectively. The method is rapid, accurate and high selectivity. It was feasible for the determination of trace level phenolic compounds in environmental samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据