4.6 Review

Healthcare Disparities in Critical Illness

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 12, 页码 2784-2793

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a84a43

关键词

critical illness; health disparities; organ dysfunction; outcomes

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1 TR000454]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [R21 HL110044]
  3. National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [P50 AA013757]
  4. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [R01 FD003440]
  5. NIH
  6. FDA
  7. [NHLBI: R01 HL086667]
  8. [UO1 HL108712]
  9. [R01 AG035117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To summarize the current literature on racial and gender disparities in critical care and the mechanisms underlying these disparities in the course of acute critical illness. Data Sources: MEDLINE search on the published literature addressing racial, ethnic, or gender disparities in acute critical illness, such as sepsis, acute lung injury, pneumonia, venous thromboembolism, and cardiac arrest. Study Selection: Clinical studies that evaluated general critically ill patient populations in the United States as well as specific critical care conditions were reviewed with a focus on studies evaluating factors and contributors to health disparities. Data Extraction: Study findings are presented according to their association with the prevalence, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes in acute critical illness. Data Synthesis: This review presents potential contributors for racial and gender disparities related to genetic susceptibility, comorbidities, preventive health services, socioeconomic factors, cultural differences, and access to care. The data are organized along the course of acute critical illness. Conclusions: The literature to date shows that disparities in critical care are most likely multifactorial involving individual, community, and hospital-level factors at several points in the continuum of acute critical illness. The data presented identify potential targets as interventions to reduce disparities in critical care and future avenues for research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据