4.6 Review

Sedation for critically ill adults with severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 2743-2751

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318228236f

关键词

benzodiazepines; etomidate; hypnotics; intensive care unit; ketamine; opioid analgesics; propofol; traumatic brain injury; sedatives

资金

  1. Hospira
  2. Heart and Stroke Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To summarize randomized controlled trials on the effects of sedative agents on neurologic outcome, mortality, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and adverse drug events in critically ill adults with severe traumatic brain injury. Data Sources: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database, Google Scholar, two clinical trials registries, personal files, and reference lists of included articles. Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials of propofol, ketamine, etomidate, and agents from the opioid, benzodiazepine, alpha-2 agonist, and antipsychotic drug classes for management of adult intensive care unit patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Data Extraction: In duplicate and independently, two investigators extracted data and evaluated methodologic quality and results. Data Synthesis: Among 1,892 citations, 13 randomized controlled trials enrolling 380 patients met inclusion criteria. Longterm sedation (>= 24 hrs) was addressed in six studies, whereas a bolus dose, short infusion, or doubling of plasma drug concentration was investigated in remaining trials. Most trials did not describe baseline traumatic brain injury prognostic factors or important cointerventions. Eight trials possibly or definitely concealed allocation and six were blinded. Insufficient data exist regarding the effects of sedative agents on neurologic outcome or mortality. Although their effects are likely transient, bolus doses of opioids may increase intracranial pressure and decrease cerebral perfusion pressure. In one study, a long-term infusion of propofol vs. morphine was associated with a reduced requirement for intracranial pressure-lowering cointerventions and a lower intracranial pressure on the third day. Trials of propofol vs. midazolam and ketamine vs. sufentanil found no difference between agents in intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure. Conclusions: This systematic review found no convincing evidence that one sedative agent is more efficacious than another for improvement of patient-centered outcomes, intracranial pressure, or cerebral perfusion pressure in critically ill adults with severe traumatic brain injury. High bolus doses of opioids, however, have potentially deleterious effects on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure. Adequately powered, high-quality, randomized controlled trials are urgently warranted. (Crit Care Med 2011; 39:2743-2751)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据