期刊
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 101-108出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b43282
关键词
cardiac arrest; resuscitation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; heart arrest; ventricular fibrillation; registry; survival
资金
- American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee
- Endowed Chair of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Laerdal Foundation for Acute Care Medicine
- Medical Education Innovations, Inc.
- Zoll Medical
- Medtronic Emergency Response Systems
Objective. To determine the relationship of electrocardiographic rhythm during cardiac arrest with survival outcomes. Design: Prospective, observational study. Setting: Total of 411 hospitals in the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Patients: Total of 51,919 adult patients with pulseless cardiac arrests from April 1999 to July 2005. Measurements and Main Results: Registry data collected included first documented rhythm, patient demographics, pre-event data, event data, and survival and neurologic outcome data. Of 51,919 indexed cardiac arrests, first documented pulseless rhythm was ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 3810 (7%), ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 8718 (17%), pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in 19,262 (37%) and asystole 20,129 (39%). Subsequent VT/VF (that is, VT or VF occurring during resuscitation for PEA or asystole) occurred in 5154 (27%), with first documented rhythm of PEA and 4988 (25%) with asystole. Survival to hospital discharge rate was not different between those with first documented VF and VT (37% each, adjusted odds ratio [OR]) 1.08; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.95-1.23). Survival to hospital discharge was slightly more likely after PEA than asystole (12% vs. 11%, adjusted OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.00-1.18), Survival to discharge was substantially more likely after first documented VT/VF than PEA/asystole (adjusted OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.55-1.82). Survival to discharge was also more likely after PEA/asystole without subsequent VT/VF compared with PEA/asystole with subsequent VT/VF (14% vs. 7% for PEA without vs. with subsequent VT/VF; 12% vs. 8% for asystole without vs. with subsequent VT/VF; adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.44-1.80). Conclusions: Survival to hospital discharge was substantially more likely when the first documented rhythm was shockable rather than nonshockable, and slightly more likely after PEA than asystole. Survival to hospital discharge was less likely following PEA/asystole with subsequent VT/VF compared to PEA/asystole without subsequent VT/VF. (Crit Care Med 2010; 38:101-108)
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据