4.6 Article

Acute left ventricular dilatation and shock-induced myocardial dysfunction

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 441-447

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318194ac44

关键词

septic shock; myocardial dysfunction; echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Whether cardiac ventricles can acutely dilate during septic myocardial dysfunction. Design: A prospective echocardiographic study was performed to assess changes of left ventricular dimensions over time in patients with septic shock. Settings: A 20-bed surgical intensive care unit of Pitie-Salpetriere university hospital in Paris. Patients: Forty-five patients were studied over the first 10 days of septic shock. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results. Left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA), fractional area change (FAC), velocity time integral of the aortic flow, echocardiographic indices of left ventricular relaxation, and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) were measured at day 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 10. Three groups were defined: 29 patients without increased cTnl and cardiac impairment (group 1), eight patients with increased cTnl and left systolic ventricular dysfunction (group 2), and eight patients with increased cTnI and isolated impairment of left ventricular relaxation (group 3). At day 1, LVEDA was significantly higher in group 2 (13 +/- 3 cm/m(2), p < 0.05) compared with groups 1 (10 +/- 2 cm/m(2)) and 3 (11 +/- 2 cm/m(2)). LVEDA did not change in groups 1 and 3. In group 2, LVEDA and FAC returned within 10 days to values observed in groups 1 and 2. A significant correlation was found between aortic velocity time integral and LVDEA (r =.78, p = 0.022) and FAC (r =.89, p = 0.003) only in group 2. Conclusions: Acute and reversible left ventricular dilation accompanies septic shock-induced systolic left ventricular dysfunction. When septic myocardial abnormalities are limited to reversible impairment of left ventricular relaxation, left ventricular dimensions remain unchanged. (Crit Care Med 2009; 37:441-447)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据