4.6 Review

Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: Consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 1937-1949

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817603ba

关键词

corticosteroid; glucocorticoid; insufficiency; deficiency; adult; adrenal glands; diagnosis; management; consensus statement; guidelines; Delphi methodology; evidence-based medicine; sepsis; cortisol; critical care; intensive care units; intensive care; shock septic; surgery; stress dosing

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G116/172] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G116/172] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To develop consensus statements for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients. Participants: A multidisciplinary, multispecialty task force of experts in critical care medicine was convened from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. In addition, international experts in endocrinology were invited to participate. Design/Methods: The task force members reviewed published literature and provided expert opinion from which the consensus was derived. The consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi methodology. The strength of each recommendation was quantified using the Modified GRADE system, which classifies recommendations as strong (grade 1) or weak (grade 2) and the quality of evidence as high (grade A), moderate (grade B), or low (grade C) based on factors that include the study design, the consistency of the results, and the directness of the evidence. Results. The task force coined the term critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency to describe the dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis that occurs during critical illness. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency is caused by adrenal insufficiency together with tissue corticosteroid resistance and is characterized by an exaggerated and protracted proinflammatory response. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency should be suspected in hypotensive patents who have responded poorly to fluids and vasopressor agents, particularly in the setting of sepsis. At this time, the diagnosis of tissue corticosteroid resistance remains problematic. Adrenal insufficiency in critically ill patents is best made by a delta total serum cortisol of <9 mu g/dL after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (250 mu g) administration or a random total cortisol of <10 mu g/dL The benefit of treatment with glucocorticoids at this time seems to be limited to patents with vasopressor-dependent septic shock and patents with early severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (Pao(2)/FIO2 of <200 and within 14 days of onset). The adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation test should not be used to identify those patents with septic shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome who should receive glucocorticoids. Hydrocortisone in a dose of 200 mg/day in four divided doses or as a continuous infusion in a dose of 240 mg/day (10 mg/hr) for >= 7 days is recommended for septic shock. Methylprednisolone in a dose of 1 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) for >= 14 days is recommended in patents with severe early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Glucocorticoids should be weaned and not stopped abruptly. Reinstitution of treatment should be considered with recurrence of signs of sepsis, hypotension, or worsening oxygenation. Dexamethasone is not recommended to treat critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. The role of glucocorticoids in the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia, liver failure, pancreatitis, those undergoing cardiac surgery, and other groups of critically ill patents requires further investigation. Conclusion: Evidence-linked consensus statements with regard to the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid deficiency in critically ill patients have been developed by a multidisciplinary, multispecialty task force.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据