4.2 Article

Preparation of Novel Pyridine-Based Aromatic Polyimides and Effect of Fluorine Functionality

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 8451-8459

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2015.11444

关键词

Pyridine-Containing; Branched Polyimide Fluorinated Solubility

资金

  1. Konkuk University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel pyridine-containing linear and branched polyimides (Li-Pls and Br-Pls) were prepared by aromatic diamine and triamine monomers. The fluorinated, non-fluorinated and trifunctional pyridine-based monomers, 4-(4-(trifluoromethylphenyl))-2,6-bis(4-aminophenyl)pyridine (FDAPP), 4-phenyl-2,6-bis(4-aminophenyl)pyridine (DAPP) and 4,4',4 ''-(pyridine-2,4,6-triyptribenzenamine (TAPP) amino compounds were synthesized by a modified Chichibabin reaction of different benzaldehydes and p-nitroacetophenone, followed by a reduction of the resulting nitro compounds with hydrazine monohydrate. Functional amine monomers were used to synthesize a series of pyridine-containing linear and branched polyimides, by polycondensation with aromatic dianhydride in N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) via the conventional two-step method. The obtained novel polyimides (Pls) exhibited good solubility in common organic solvents, such as m-Cresol, NMP, DMF, DMSO and DMAc. Moreover, obtained PI films were flexible and showed excellent thermal stability, with the glass transition temperature (T-g) of 264-331 degrees C and the temperature at 10% weight loss of 580-620 degrees C in a nitrogen atmosphere. The protonated polymer showed UV-vis absorption in the region of 200-400 nm, good optical transparency with the cut-off wave lengths of 372-392 nm, as well as a low dielectric constant (epsilon) in the range of 3.897-4.276 at 1 MHz. Moreover, the resulted Pls derived from DAPP, FDAPP and TAPP were compared on the basis of fluorine functionality with non-fluorinated parallels, and the effect of branching units was compared with linear polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据