4.4 Article

Self-assembly of robotic micro- and nanoswimmers using magnetic nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-014-2737-z

关键词

Micro- and nanorobotics; Micro- and nanoswimmers; Low Reynolds number; Magnetic self-assembly; Magnetic nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1000255]
  2. Army Research Office [W911NF-11-1-0490]
  3. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Global Research Laboratory (K-GRL)
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (NSF-GRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micro- and nanoscale robotic swimmers are very promising to significantly enhance the performance of particulate drug delivery by providing high accuracy at extremely small scales. Here, we introduce micro- and nanoswimmers fabricated using self-assembly of nanoparticles and control via magnetic fields. Nanoparticles self-align into parallel chains under magnetization. The swimmers exhibit flexibility under a rotating magnetic field resulting in chiral structures upon deformation, thereby having the prerequisite for non-reciprocal motion to move about at low Reynolds number. The swimmers are actuated wirelessly using an external rotating magnetic field supplied by approximate Helmholtz coils. By controlling the concentration of the suspended magnetic nanoparticles, the swimmers can be modulated into different sizes. Nanoscale swimmers are largely influenced by Brownian motion, as observed from their jerky trajectories. The microswimmers, which are roughly three times larger, are less vulnerable to the effects from Brownian motion. In this paper, we demonstrate responsive directional control of micro- and nanoswimmers and compare their respective diffusivities and trajectories to characterize the implications of Brownian disturbance on the motions of small and large swimmers. We then performed a simulation using a kinematic model for the magnetic swimmers including the stochastic nature of Brownian motion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据