4.7 Article

On the fundamentals of electrochemical corrosion of X65 steel in CO2-containing formation water in the presence of acetic acid in petroleum production

期刊

CORROSION SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 87-94

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.10.013

关键词

Steel; EIS; Electrochemical calculation; Polarization; Acid corrosion

资金

  1. Canada Research Chairs Program
  2. atural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. University Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical corrosion behavior of X65 steel in CO2-containing oilfield formation water in the presence of acetic acid (HAc) was investigated by various electrochemical measurements and analyses as well as thermodynamic calculations of ionic concentrations, reaction rate constants and equilibrium electrode potentials. A conceptual model was developed to illustrate corrosion processes of steel in oilfield formation water system. The anodic reactions of the steel contain a direct dissolution of Fe, Fe -> Fe2+ + 2e, and the formation of corrosion scale, FeCO3, by Fe + HCO3- -> FeCO3 + H+ 2e. The cathodic processes contain the reduction of H+, HCO3-, H2O and HAc, where reduction of HAc has the least negative equilibrium potential and thus dominates the cathodic process. With addition of HAc in the solution, both cathodic and anodic reaction rates increase remarkably. It is attributed to the fact that HAc inhibits or degrades the formation of protective scales due to the decrease of solution pH. Upon electrode rotation, the measured impedance decreases with the increase in HAc concentration. The FeCO3 scale will not form on electrode surface. When HAc concentration is less than 1000 ppm, the adsorbed intermediate product is not significant, resulting in generation of a low-frequency inductive loop in EIS plots. When HAc concentration is more than 3000 ppm, the adsorption of intermediate product is significant, generating overlapped capacitive semicircles in EIS measurements. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据