4.7 Article

Relation between corrosion behavior and microstructure of Mg-Zn-Y alloys prepared by rapid solidification at various cooling rates

期刊

CORROSION SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 395-402

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.11.003

关键词

Magnesium alloy; Long period stacking ordered structure; Cooling rate; Filiform corrosion; Passivity

资金

  1. Advancement of Technological Excellence, JST
  2. MEXT, Japan [20686050, 19206075]
  3. Japan Society for Promotion of Science for Young Scientists
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19206075, 20686050] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relation between corrosion resistance and microstructure of Mg-Zn-Y alloys with a long period stacking ordered (LPSO) phase has been investigated. In order to clarify the influence of microstructure evolution by rapid solidification on the occurrence of localized corrosion such as filiform, corrosion, several Mg97.25Zn0.75Y2 (at. %) alloys with different cooling rates were fabricated by the gravity casting, copper mould injection casting and melt-spinning techniques and their corrosion behavior and microstructures were examined by the salt immersion tests, electrochemical measurements, XRD and TEM. When the cooling rate was less than 3 x 10(4) K s(-1), filiform corrosion propagated in the early stage of salt immersion test, due to formation of a massive block-shaped LPSO phase during casting. On the other hand, when the cooling rate was increased up to 3 x 10(4) K s(-1), rapidly solidified (RS) alloys exhibited excellent corrosion resistance because of grain refinement and formation of a supersaturated single-phase solid solution. Large-sized Mg97.25Zn0.75Y2 alloys fabricated by consolidation of the RS ribbons also exhibited excellent corrosion resistance with passivity. Enhancement of microstructural and electrochemical homogeneities in the Mg-Zn-Y alloys by rapid solidification techniques results in the passivity or substrate materials. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据