4.1 Article

Is lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity correlated with fibrous-cap thickness and plaque volume in patients with acute coronary syndrome?

期刊

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 10-15

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000041

关键词

fibrous-cap thickness; inflammation; lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2); optical coherence tomography

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171430/H1816, 81300201]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M531074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundLipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) is a specific biomarker specific for vascular inflammation. Inflammation has a significant association with plaque progression. The fibrous-cap thickness (FCT) is one of the major determinants of plaque vulnerability in atherosclerotic plaques. However, data on the relationship between Lp-PLA(2) activity and FCT in lipid plaque are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the in-vivo association between changes in Lp-PLA(2) activity and FCT and plaque volume in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Patients and methodsTwenty-four consecutive patients with ACS were enrolled between May 2010 and May 2012. The plaque volume and FCT of nonculprit lipid-rich plaques were assessed by intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, respectively, at baseline and after 12 months. Lp-PLA(2) activity was determined using the colorimetric assay kit.ResultsDuring the 12 months of observation, FCT increased significantly from baseline to follow-up, with a mean percent change of 74.446.8%. A significant correlation was observed between changes in Lp-PLA(2) activity and changes in FCT (r=-0.56, P=0.006). Changes in plaque volume were also correlated significantly with changes in Lp-PLA(2) activity during the study period (r=0.52, P=0.01).ConclusionSignificant associations between serial changes in Lp-PLA(2) activity and changes in FCT and plaque volume were observed in patients with ACS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据