4.4 Article

Tear Osmolarity and Tear Film Parameters in Patients With Unilateral Pterygium

期刊

CORNEA
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 1174-1178

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000221

关键词

pterygium; tear osmolarity; dry eye disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in tear osmolarity and tear film parameters between pterygium-affected and healthy fellow eyes. Methods: The study enrolled 65 patients with unilateral pterygium. Tear osmolarity, tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test measurements, fluorescein corneal staining, and conjunctival redness were evaluated. The results were compared between pterygium-affected eyes and healthy fellow eyes of the same patient (controls). The pterygium thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography. We also evaluated the relationship between pterygium thickness and tear osmolarity and between TBUT and Schirmer I test results in eyes with pterygium. Results: The mean tear osmolarity was 307 mOsm/L in pterygium-affected eyes and 294 mOsm/L in control eyes. The mean values of TBUT, Schirmer I test, corneal staining, and conjunctival redness scores were 10.3 +/- 3.4 seconds, 14.8 +/- 9.2 mm, 1.2 +/- 1.1, and 0.9 +/- 0.9 in the pterygium group, whereas the mean values were 12.3 +/- 4.4 seconds, 16.2 +/- 7.2 mm, 0.4 +/- 0.8, and 0.4 +/- 0.7 in the control group, respectively. Eyes with pterygium had significantly higher tear osmolarity levels, corneal staining, and conjunctival redness scores; and lower tear film TBUT and Schirmer I test values than eyes without pterygium (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between pterygium thickness versus tear osmolarity, TBUT, and Schirmer I test values in eyes with pterygium (r = 0.159, 0.738, 0.321, respectively; P > 0.05). Conclusions: This study showed that pterygium is associated with tear hyperosmolarity and abnormal tear film function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据