4.4 Article

Short-Term Corneal Response to Cross-Linking in Rabbit Eyes Assessed by In Vivo Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and Histology

期刊

CORNEA
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 196-203

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181e16d93

关键词

activated keratocytes; confocal microscopy; wound healing

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Corneal cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus has been tested in animal trials and proven clinically. A combination of in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and histology was used in rabbit corneas to assess early modifications at the cellular level after corneal cross-linking. Methods: Twelve New Zealand male rabbits were tested; in each case, the right eye was the study eye and left eye was the control eye. In vivo CLSM was performed on both eyes before and at 3 days and 1 week after cross-linking. Keratocyte and endothelial cell densities were determined by CLSM before and after cross-linking. After CLSM, the corneas were excised and processed for histology and immunohistochemistry. Results: Massive edema was observed 3 days after cross-linking. The corneal epithelium had already closed again by day 3. No cellular structures were detected in the stroma and endothelium. One week after cross-linking, normal corneal transparency and thickness were restored. The anterior stroma still lacked nuclei. The number of nuclei in the posterior stroma was significantly lower than that in the intact corneas. Highly reflective spindle-shaped structures were detected in the posterior stroma. The endothelial monolayer had closed again but still showed significantly decreased cell density. At 1 week after cross-linking, immunohistochemical staining revealed the presence of proliferating cells in the corneal epithelium, posterior stroma, and endothelium. Conclusions: The early response of the rabbit cornea to cross-linking was successfully characterized at the cellular level by in vivo CLSM and histology, and the results obtained with both techniques correlated positively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据