4.5 Article

Effects of temperature and light on the progression of black band disease on the reef coral, Montipora hispida

期刊

CORAL REEFS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 753-761

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-011-0751-5

关键词

Coral disease; Environmental driver; Temperature; Light; Great Barrier Reef; Black band disease

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Disease Working Group in the Coral Reef Targeted Research and Capacity Building for Management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding environmental drivers of black band disease (BBD), a virulent disease affecting corals worldwide, is critical to managing coral populations. Field monitoring studies have implicated seasonally elevated temperature and light as drivers of annual BBD outbreaks on the Great Barrier Reef, but do not distinguish their relative impacts. Here, we compare progression of BBD lesions on Montipora hispida among three controlled temperature (28.0, 29.0, 30.5A degrees C) and two controlled light treatments (170, 440 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) within normal seasonal ranges at the site. BBD progression rates were greatest (5.2 mm d(-1)) in the 30.5A degrees C/high-light treatment and least (3.2 mm d(-1)) in the 28A degrees C/low-light treatment. High light significantly enhanced BBD progression, whereas increases in disease progression under high temperatures were not statistically significant, identifying the greater role of light in driving BBD dynamics within the temperature range examined. Greater BBD progression during daytime compared with nighttime (by 2.2-3.6-fold across temperature and light treatments) corroborates our conclusion that light is the pre-eminent factor driving BBD progression at typical summer temperatures. Decreased photochemical efficiency of algal endosymbionts in the high-temperature/high-light treatments suggests that compromised health of the coral holobiont contributes to enhanced disease progression, highlighting the complexity of disease dynamics in host-pathogen systems responding to environmental changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据