4.2 Article

Home Range, Spatial Overlap, and Burrow Use of the Desert Tortoise in the West Mojave Desert

期刊

COPEIA
卷 -, 期 2, 页码 378-389

出版社

AMER SOC ICHTHYOLOGISTS & HERPETOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1643/CE-07-226

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) [TE066452I]
  2. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG)
  3. Memorandum of Understanding for Scientific Collecting Permit [802005-03]
  4. The Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL)
  5. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC)
  6. ITS Corporation
  7. Directorate of Public Works at Fort Irwin National Training Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the space use patterns of a population may provide crucial Information regarding land management decisions, such as delineation of protected areas. Herein we provide a comprehensive analysis of factors affecting the space use of Desert Tortoises In the west Mojave Desert, including physical, social, and environmental variables. Our objectives were to determine how spatial overlap, as well as multiple parameters of burrow use, Influence home range size of this species. Male tortoises were significantly larger than females and exhibited very different patterns of space and burrow use; however, body size did not affect these variables. Male home range (100% MCP) and core area (50% MCP) size averaged 65% and 73% larger than those of females. Burrow use by males and females affected core area size, but not home range area. Females exhibited a strong male bias in overlap of both estimates of space use and burrow sharing, while using a significantly lower number of burrows per year. However, males overlapped and shared burrows with a similar number of tortoises of either sex. In addition, a high degree of home range overlap between individuals suggests a lack of territoriality In this population, although this warrants further analysis. These results suggest that social factors may not be the primary determinants of space use in this Desert Tortoise population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据